The organisation called on these governments and others - including Belgium and South Africa which have recently supplied military assistance and France, which supplies crucial components for helicopters assembled and delivered by India - not to resume military assistance or arms supplies destined for Nepal until the security forces can demonstrate that they will uphold human rights. A new report from the organisation outlines the case for the suspension of all transfers of arms and related logistical and security supplies to Nepal that can be used to commit grave human rights violations. The report, Nepal: Military assistance contributing to grave human rights violations, focuses particular attention on military aid, arms transfers and training provided to Nepal's armed forces by governments during the 9-year armed conflict between Nepalese security forces and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). It also examines the supply of arms from private companies and the role governments play in providing export licenses for such sales. Despite overwhelming evidence that such military assistance has been used for the killing and abduction of civilians by both sides in the conflict, it has only recently been suspended and in some cases still continues. "With the conflict poised to escalate, any further military assistance would be highly irresponsible. Arms should not be exported as long as there is a clear risk that they might be used to commit serious human rights abuse. As has already been demonstrated, civilians will be those who suffer most," said Purna Sen, Director of Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific Programme. The
reports main findings include:
The export of 25,000 5.56mm infantry rifles (INSAS) to Nepal from India,
despite evidence of their use in grave human rights violations such as
the murder of 19 unarmed Maoist suspects by Nepalese security forces in
August 2003;
Amnesty
International is calling for the suspension of all arms supplies and military
assistance to Nepal until the government takes clear steps to halt human
rights violations and bring those responsible to justice. Specifically,
the Government of Nepal must implement the recommendations of the UN Commission
on Human Rights as contained in its April 2005 resolution. These include
an end to arbitrary arrests and "disappearances", clarification of the
fate of all "disappeared", the amendment of security legislation, the institution
of prompt, independent and impartial investigations of all alleged violations
of human rights and the prosecution of all those responsible.
Amnesty International today condemned the killing of 45 civilians and wounding of at least 70 others in a landmine explosion for which the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) have acknowledged responsibility. It called upon the CPN (Maoist) leadership to publish in full the results of its internal investigation into this indiscriminate attack on civilians and the action taken against those responsible. The landmine explosion took place in the morning of 6 June 2005 at Madi, Chitwan district, southern Nepal. According to a Maoist internet site, the Maoist leadership has announced that it was carrying out a "serious investigation" into the incident. It is not the first time the Maoist leadership has announced an investigation in response to strong criticism for attacks on civilians. Amnesty International is calling for immediate and effective action against those found to have been responsible and for measures to be put in place to ensure it does not happen again. Background
It
is a basic principle of international humanitarian law that persons fighting
in armed conflict must, at all times, distinguish between civilians and
combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives. The "principle
of distinction", as this rule is known, is the cornerstone of international
humanitarian law and binding on all parties to armed conflicts, whether
international or non-international. Whereas it is not unlawful to target
combatants for attack, specific rules are aimed at protecting civilians
and other non-combatants - they must not be the object of attack. Indiscriminate
attacks, including attacks on military objectives that are expected to
cause excessive loss of civilian lives or damage to civilian objects (the
principle of proportionality) are similarly prohibited, as is the use of
civilians as "human shields". In Nepal, both the CPN (Maoist) and the security
forces have repeatedly breached these rules.
|