Kathmandu/Brussels, 27 October 2005: Despite the Maoist rebels' brutality and violence, there can be no resolution of Nepal's conflict without confronting their strengths and tackling their political agenda. Nepal's Maoists: Their Aims, Structure and Strategy, the latest report from the International Crisis Group, examines the insurgency in detail and offers insight into dealing with it. Through both force of arms and force of ideas, the Maoists have emerged as a formidable political organisation. They have been more successful than anyone envisaged, and their movement will not be easily displaced. "Whatever the outcome of their armed insurgency, they have changed politics irrevocably", says Rhoderick Chalmers, Deputy Director of Crisis Group's South Asia Project. The Maoists have brought into sharp focus the failures of past gestures towards land reform, ethnic, caste and gender equality and regional issues, social and economic iniquities and decades of failed development. Most visibly and painfully, however, they have successfully demonstrated that Nepali society does indeed contain a capacity for violence that can be turned to political ends. They have employed force since the start of their armed campaign in 1996, including torture, execution and other forms of violence. But they have also been more restrained than many insurgent groups. The Maoists are not the next Khmer Rouge, nor are they a terrorist organisation that refuses to talk. They have limited civilian casualties and also left the economy functional, if weakened. There are encouraging signs that serious negotiations will be possible, but the Maoists will rejoin mainstream politics only if they see sufficient advantages in it and are convinced they will not make greater gains by other means. "The unilateral three-month ceasefire announced by the Maoists in September 2005 is welcome, though temporary and conditional", says Robert Templer, Director of Crisis Group's Asia Program. "Now the Maoists will have to work hard to convince mainstream parties they can fully abandon their violent repression. The government's refusal to reciprocate the ceasefire, however, only encourages renewal of the conflict". Behaviour towards the newly established United Nations human rights mission will be a crucial test of Maoist attitudes and capacities. If they can prove they are ready for peace and capable of implementing a negotiated settlement, the political mainstream will be ready to deal with them. Judging by widespread popular relief following the September 2005 ceasefire, Nepal's people would back a reasonable compromise that delivers peace. To
find out more, visit the Crisis Group's Maoist Insurgency page, which has
links to Crisis Group's reports and opinion pieces on the conflict, details
of our advocacy efforts to date, links to other resources, and information
on what you can do to support Crisis Group's efforts.
|